Complete Property Market Updates of Singapore

May 12, 2008

Two industrial sites, good class bungalow up for sale

Filed under: Commercial, General, Land Sale, Property Investment, Rental News — Propertymarketupdates @ 1:18 am

TWO freehold industrial sites - at 18 Howard Road and 27 New Industrial Road, in the north-eastern part of Singapore - are for sale by tender at indicative prices of $30 million ($272 per sq ft per plot ratio) and $14 million ($278 psf ppr) respectively.

Charles Hoon, director of investment properties at marketing agent CB Richard Ellis, said the sites are zoned Business 1 under Master Plan 2003. This means 40 per cent of gross floor area can be used for purposes such as offices, showrooms or workers’ dormitories.

‘While industrial capital values and rents have recovered, industrial space still presents an attractive option, compared with office space, for businesses to relocate their backroom operations.’

The two sites are conveniently located and of regular shape, he said. And their freehold tenure is an ‘added advantage’.

The 18 Howard Road site is a 44,000 sq ft vacant plot in Macpherson Industrial Estate. The 20,000 sq ft 27 New Industrial Road is in the New Industrial Road cluster.

Separately, DTZ Debenham Tie Leung is marketing a 999-leasehold Good Class Bungalow (GCB) site in Yarwood Avenue. The 69,540 sq ft site, close to Binjai Park, has been put up for sale through an expression-of-interest exercise at an indicative price of $750-$800 psf.

According to DTZ, it has redevelopment potential to accommodate four GCBs. It now houses a single storey detached house with an outhouse, swimming pool and tennis court.

Shaun Poh, DTZ’s senior director for investment advisory services and auction, said: ‘This is a rarely available large plot of land in a prime location, offering a myriad of possibilities.’

Recent transactions of GCB land in the area include sites on Kilburn Estate for around $860 psf and Binjai Park for around $850 psf, he said.

Source : Business Times - 6 May 2008

May 9, 2008

Reach out to your customers the smart way

Filed under: Agency News, General, Property Add Value, Property Investment — Propertymarketupdates @ 2:50 am

BUSINESSES in Singapore are learning to tap infocomm to transform their processes and gear themselves up to take advantage of new market opportunities. An example is real estate company HSR, which pioneered a new way for its agents to help buyers find their dream home using a system called SMARTplus.

A SMARTplus programme called iMatch enables HSR agents to specify the criteria for the house they are looking for their buyers. On finding a perfect match, the system will alert the agent via SMS and send an email with more details about the property. Agents can also view the latest property listings online, with just a few clicks of the mouse.

SMARTplus also comes as a boon for the agents. They can now discuss issues, share their opinions and seek advice on the online forum, and update themselves on upcoming courses and events using the HSR eCalendar. By allowing agents to work from any location that has Internet access, the system has also enabled them to cut down on travelling and make more productive use of their time. In fact, the system has been so popular that HSR increased its recruitment of agents by up to 40 per cent with its implementation.

Like HSR, used car exporter Sunauto has also been leveraging on infocomm to reach out to customers in new and innovative ways while enhancing staff efficiency.

Sunauto exports quality used cars to various parts of the world, and has also made inroads into the parallel import market. All these have been made possible through the development of an online presence, backed by a system that automates many of its processes.

Today, instead of paper-based orders, Sunauto’s customers can order used cars online.

Through the company’s website, they can access the latest information on the used car inventory, and view the photos and specifications of vehicles.

At the same time, manual tasks such as the storage and retrieval of car photographs and other data have been automated, reducing the manpower required and cutting down on errors due to inconsistent information or missing documents. These developments have helped to free Sunauto’s manpower resources to focus on broadening its business lines and developing its regional strategy.

Like HSR and Sunauto, SMEs in Singapore can learn to leverage on infocomm to expand their market reach and tap new business opportunities.

A good starting point would be to tap the Technology Innovation Programme (TIP), which is jointly administered by the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA) and Spring Singapore.

Calling on more SMEs to take advantage of the programme, Lo Yoong Khong, Cluster Director, IDA, said: ‘If you have an innovative idea on how infocomm can better your business, make use of the support from TIP to turn it into a reality. Through the adoption of infocomm, businesses can make a difference in the way they operate. Infocomm can relieve them of the operational challenges they face daily, and allow them to focus on sourcing for new markets and business opportunities.’

This article is contributed by the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA)

———————————————————————–

Infocomm public education for SMEs

The Technology Innovation Programme (TIP) supports SMEs in infocomm innovation projects and helps to defray up to 50 per cent of the qualifying cost. TIP can also defray up to 70 per cent of the qualifying cost for industry-wide projects.

Source : Business Times - 6 May 2008

May 5, 2008

Mapletree assets to hit $15b-20b in a year

Filed under: General, Property Investment, REIT, Regulators — Propertymarketupdates @ 2:24 pm

Mapletree Investments’ total asset size, comprising assets under management as well as on its own balance sheet, has nearly doubled to around $10.5 billion - inclusive of the recently announced acquisition of a $1.7 billion portfolio from JTC Corp - from $5.6 billion a year ago.

In a year’s time, it could grow further to $15 billion-$20 billion, Mapletree Investments CEO Hiew Yoon Khong told BT in a recent interview.

The increase will come largely from new private funds the fully-owned unit of Temasek Holdings is starting, including the US$1.5 billion-US$2.0 billion Mapletree India-China Fund (MICF) focusing on development and opportunistic redevelopment of real estate in the two mega markets. ‘This fund will invest in office, retail and residential property,’ Mr Hiew said.

The first closing, which has just been completed, has raised US$600 million, contributed equally by Mapletree and an international institutional investor that has declined to be named.

The fund’s second closing, slated for July, will also see Mapletree and the investor putting in US$200 million each, with another US$500 million to US$1 billion to be subscribed by third-party investors.

MICF has secured two seed investments in China. One is a residential and retail development named Future City in Xi’an’s Beilin District. The project has a total development value of $196 million and will span almost 1.56 million sq ft in gross floor area. Future City will have four residential towers and a nearly 400,000 sq ft mall to be named VivoCity Xi’an. Construction began in March last year and the development is slated for completion by July 2010. The targeted opening date for the mall is October 2010.

The second seed investment for MICF is an existing office block in Beijing’s Central Business District with a gross floor area of around 400,000 sq ft and an investment value of about $165 million. Upon completion of the acquisition in June 2008, an anchor tenant will lease 35 per cent of net lettable area. ‘We expect to seal a third investment in China soon for MICF - a retail and serviced apartment development in Guangzhou,’ said the 46-year-old former investment banker.

As for India, the fund has identified two investments in Bangalore - an office and residential project, and a pure office development.

Over the next 12 months, Mapletree also expects to start sequel funds to the Malaysia-focused CIMB Mapletree Real Estate Fund (CMREF) and the Mapletree Industrial Fund (MIF). The latter has so far bought some $300 million of non-warehouse industrial properties in Singapore, Malaysia and China. ‘For CMREF 2, we are targeting to raise about RM1 billion (S$430 million); CMREF 1’s RM500 million is almost fully invested,’ Mr Hiew said.

The group has held back plans to float more real estate investment trusts or Reits in Singapore because of unfavourable financial market conditions. One of these is the Mapletree Commercial Trust, which will hold about $3 billion of Mapletree’s Singapore assets in the HarbourFront and Alexandra Road areas. ‘With the deferment, we’ve been focusing on growing the net income of the initial assets planned for the commercial trust and working on building a strong pipeline of assets for possible acquisition by the trust,’ Mr Hiew said.

‘We’ll launch the trust when the market stabilises, hopefully before the end of the year,’ he added.

The centrepiece of the trust will be VivoCity, valued at about $2 billion. Other assets are likely to include nightspot St James Power Station, HarbourFront Centre, PSA Building and Merrill Lynch HarbourFront, which is slated for completion in the third quarter of this year.

The future acquisition pipeline for the trust includes two projects currently under construction - Mapletree Anson, a 19-storey Grade A building at Anson Road/Enggor Street slated for completion in Q3 2009, and Mapletree Business City, which which is expected to be ready in the second half of 2010.

The latter project is being built on the site of the former Alexandra Distripark (Blocks 1-3) and on an adjacent plot at Alexandra Terrace. ‘This will be a modern business campus with about 1.7 million sq ft net lettable area (NLA) comprising an office block and three business park blocks with amenities like a 350-seat auditorium, big function rooms. We’ll have a foyer for cocktails, gym with lap pool, even a childcare centre and convenience store, plus roughly 1,100 carpark lots,’ Mr Hiew said. The development will also have a foodcourt and al fresco-style restaurants.

So far, two  tenants, including a financial institution, have leased a total of about 200,000 sq ft. Mapletree Business City will be integrated with Mapletree’s adjacent properties - The Comtech and PSA Building - to form the group’s Alexandra Precinct assets. PSA Building will be directly connected to Labrador MRT Station under the Circle Line opening in 2010.

As for Mapletree Anson, with about 325,000 sq ft NLA, about 40,000 sq ft has been leased so far. ‘The building’s completion in Q3 2009 will be ahead of the completion of the first phase of Marina Bay Financial Centre,’ Mr Hiew noted.

Plans to float Embassy Reit here - in partnership with India’s Embassy Group - have also been put on the backburner as structuring issues relating to changes in Indian laws on foreign funding and consequential tax issues are being ironed out first. The proposed Reit will hold business parks in Bangalore.

Source : Business Times - 5 May 2008

February 28, 2008

Let public have first bite of property before directors

Filed under: Property Investment — Propertymarketupdates @ 3:46 pm

IT was reported recently that a listed company had sold a property it had developed to the relatives of a director.

What was unusual this time was that the relatives were walk-in customers during a public sale which was held after the sales preview for invited guests.

The sale was also on the same terms as those offered to members of the public.

I feel that this approach to transacting properties with directors and their related parties represent a standard of corporate governance for other listed companies to follow.

I am sure that shareholders have no qualms about directors buying properties that were left unsold after having been launched to members of the public or even if directors purchased them during the public launch.

However, if directors were given preference to units during the pre-launch, as is often the case, these transactions should be disclosed by the company in a clear and transparent manner.

At the outset, companies should state if these property sales, or the profits from any subsequent resale by the directors, are meant to be part of their remuneration.

If they are, then the amount should be determined and, if necessary, approved at annual general meetings.

Also, if the directors were related to the major shareholder, then minority shareholders should get a chance to vote on it.

If the company’s view is that the sale was not part of their remuneration, then there should be a test of valuation or a governance guideline to be followed to ensure that revenues were maximised in the sales to directors.

The reason being, even when properties are sold at list prices without discounts, it is not clear to shareholders that the properties were sold at the best possible price.

If directors were responsible for setting prices and would also likely to have had the first pick of the best units, it is difficult for shareholders to be certain if the launch price was correctly priced to begin with.

The only way to be confident that a company got the best price for the property is if the properties were first open to third parties for purchase or bidding.

Therefore, the guideline for sales to company directors should be that the directors make purchases after the public launch, or at the very least, during the launch.

This will clear doubts on whether the transactions involving directors were in the interest of shareholders.

Source : Business Times - 5 Feb 2008

February 27, 2008

F&N looking for new investments

Filed under: Developer News, Property Investment, Regulators — Propertymarketupdates @ 11:22 pm

WHILE the current stockmarket turmoil and high prices of raw materials are sources of concern, they also provide opportunities for investment, and Fraser & Neave is on the lookout for such opportunities, the company’s new chairman said yesterday.

Former SingTel CEO Lee Hsien Yang, in his first appearance before shareholders as F&N’s chairman at its annual general meeting yesterday, was responding to a shareholder’s question on the impact of the current market volatility and high oil and other raw material prices on F&N.

Mr Lee said these were risks for any company and F&N mitigates the impact in several ways including securing part of its supplies at reasonable cost ahead of time, through proper foreign exchange management and by passing on part of the costs to customers.

‘Sometimes turbulence means opportunities to make investments at good prices, and F&N is looking for new investments, especially in the food and beverage sector,’ he said.

As he had done at SingTel, Mr Lee effortlessly dealt with a slew of questions. He must have been pretty convincing, as all nine resolutions - including one to combine his consultancy fee of $1 million together with his normal fees of $250,000 as chairman - were passed without a single opposing vote from any of the 200-odd shareholders present.

As Securities Investors Association of Singapore (SIAS) president David Gerald put it: ‘He is now chairman of F&N, one of Singapore’s largest conglomerates . . . F&N is a leading pan-Asian F&B company with 125 years of heritage. It has a ready and fantastic platform to globalise its business . . . With the amount of work he is going to do as chairman, you just have to remunerate him sufficiently . . . If his past record at SingTel is anything to go by, shareholders should watch this space for things to happen and F&N’s transparency to improve markedly.

‘During the transitional period, pending the appointment of the new CEO, Mr Lee is undertaking the huge task of acting CEO and chairman of the group. The fees of $1 million payable to him is, therefore, not commensurate with his expected contributions and efforts. He deserves more.’

Mr Gerald also felt that the $3 million paid to board member Nicky Tan’s company nTan for broking Temasek Holdings’ investment in F&N was proper, as the company got a good deal.

Mr Lee assured shareholders that the company would improve its corporate governance, which he described as a ‘constantly evolving’ process.

On the ongoing case against subsidiary Asia Pacific Breweries by two European banks which are seeking to recover some $100 million in loans made to a former finance manager, Chia Teck Leng (who has since been convicted and jailed for defrauding the two banks and two others of millions of dollars), F&N said no provisions had been made other than for legal fees. Mr Lee said the company would ‘vigorously’ defend itself against the banks’ accusations.

No shareholder expressed interest in the company’s quest for a new CEO. But Mr Lee told reporters after the AGM: ‘I have no desire to stay on as acting CEO or executive chairman for long.’ He said the company would announce a new CEO in ‘due course’.

As to why he joined F&N instead of taking up any of the numerous other offers, he quipped: ‘I thought it would be a fun company to join.’

Source : Business Times - 1 Feb 2008

Survey shows Malaysians hot on property trail

Filed under: Financing, Malaysia, Property Investment — Propertymarketupdates @ 10:32 pm

MALAYSIANS are keen property purchasers, and many are still on the lookout for investment opportunities, according to a recent survey.

Real estate website iProperty.com said that a significant 88 per cent of those polled online over six weeks in November and December expressed an intention to acquire a property within the next 12 months. Nearly half or 48 per cent of the 2,066 respondents claimed that they had purchased at least one property over the past 24 months, and 10 per cent said that they had acquired two or more.

Given the current economic uncertainties, developers who were concerned about weaker demand would be heartened to know that a fair number of Malaysians are apparently still hot on the property trail and planning to maximise loan arrangements.

More than three-quarters of respondents told iProperty that they would fund their properties by taking loans that provide 80 to 100 per cent financing. This practice allows the buyer greater disposable income to invest in other assets, Robert Kiyosaki, an investor and self-help author, told BT.

An investor who declined to be identified has acquired three apartments over the past three years and regularly attends new launches.

In his books, Mr Kiyosaki advocates investing in assets that generate passive income so that one can eventually live off those sources of funds.

In general, locals continue to show an interest in residential units over high-rise development.

iProperty said that 62 per cent of respondents, citing potential capital appreciation gains as the main reason - corresponding with their primary attraction to the property investment - indicated their preference for landed units.

This is consistent with other surveys. Over the past three years, property consultants CH Williams’ CEO opinion survey has revealed Malaysian investors to be most interested in terraced/link residential units, followed by semi-detached/detached houses. In comparison, residential condominiums/apartments are top of the property list for foreign buyers.

Buyers prefer landed properties as they tend to appreciate more over the longer term than apartments, but that is because the scarcity of land in Klang Valley, for example, has resulted in fewer houses being built.

Still, some residential apartments in prime areas are selling like hot cakes as evidenced by the following:

Over the past month, 65-70 per cent of the 318 units of Twins Damansara in the upmarket suburb of Damansara Heights, which retails from upwards of RM700,000 (S$307,160), has been sold. In November, 90 per cent of the 90-unit One Jelatek condominiums situated 10 minutes from an LRT station in Ampang were signed up in less than two hours.

Within a week of its launch this month, Gaya Bangsar saw 95 per cent of its 285 units priced between RM350,000 and RM900,000 snapped up. The developer expects the units, which were sold at an average RM550 per square foot, to appreciate by 20 to 30 per cent in the next three to four years.

The Internet is increasingly the medium used in property searches, with half of iProperty’s respondents turning to it first, and up to 86 per cent using it primarily for its speed and convenience.

Source : Business Times - 31 Jan 2008

January 9, 2008

CapitaLand makes $990m offer to take Ascott private

Filed under: Developer News, Hotel, Property Investment — Propertymarketupdates @ 2:25 am

Company sees value in subsidiary that has not been recognised by market, analysts say

Property giant CapitaLand yesterday made a general offer for its listed subsidiary Ascott Group in a deal that values the serviced residence unit at $2.8 billion.

CapitaLand, South-east Asia’s largest property firm by market value, owns 66.5 per cent of Ascott.

Under the unconditional general offer, CapitaLand aims to buy all Ascott shares it does not own at $1.73 a share. CapitaLand said that it could invest up to $989.5 million to acquire the remaining 33.5 per cent of Ascott as well as any outstanding options and awards that could be exercised.

Ascott, which last traded at $1.21 a share on Jan 4, has a market capitalisation of $1.94 billion. CapitaLand’s offer price is 43 per cent higher than the last traded price and represents a premium of 41.8 per cent to the one-month volume-weighted average price of Ascott shares.

The offer price is also a premium of about 145 per cent to Ascott’s unaudited net asset value per share as at Sept 30, 2007.

Analysts said that CapitaLand wants to take Ascott private because the latter’s value has not been fully reflected in its share price performance. The offer is also timely as Ascott’s shares are nowhere close to their peak.

The shares have fallen from their one-year high of $2.06 in May last year. And over the past one year, the company’s stock has fallen 17.7 per cent.

‘CapitaLand sees a lot of value in Ascott, but that has not been recognised by the market,’ said a property analyst.

Interest in the stock has typically been low, the analyst said, as many investors who want a stake in Ascott just buy shares of CapitaLand instead. ‘Ascott has never been that well followed,’ echoed David Lum, an analyst at the Daiwa Institute of Research. ‘It is followed, but not as followed as CapitaLand. It is not a liquid stock.’

Shares of both CapitaLand and Ascott as well as Ascott’s listed trust Ascott Residence Trust (ART) were suspended yesterday pending an announcement.

But in a move that surprised many, CapitaLand first put out a statement saying that it might make a general offer. The actual details of the offer - including the offer price - were released much later last night.

The former announcement led to market speculation that news of the intended offer could have leaked, forcing CapitaLand to first declare that an offer was in the making.

CapitaLand’s Ascott stake is thought to be key as it gives the company a global footprint. Its offer was ‘not unexpected’, analysts said.

Ascott is the biggest operator of serviced apartments in Asia and Europe. The company has close to 14,800 units in the key cities of Asia, Europe and the Gulf region as well as 5,400 units under development - making a total of over 20,200 units.

The company aims to boost revenue by expanding the number of units to 25,000 by 2010. And for its next phase of growth, it will look to emerging markets, its chief executive, Jennie Chua, has said.

If Ascott is delisted, it will be able to move faster on projects together with CapitaLand, the developer said. CapitaLand will also be able to fully integrate Ascott’s business and operations into the whole group, which will allow it to deploy capital and human resources seamlessly within the group.

Analysts compared CapitaLand’s offer for Ascott to OCBC Bank’s bid for its listed unit, Great Eastern Holdings.

OCBC has made offers to buy out Great Eastern in the past and has steadily accumulated shares in its subsidiary over time. However, the bank has not made offers at very high premiums to those shareholders who have yet to sell. CapitaLand is similarly unlikely to offer high premiums to buy out Ascott shareholders who hold out, analysts said.

CapitaLand’s shares closed at $6.25 on Jan 4, the last day of trading before the counter was suspended. The acquisition will be funded by bank borrowings, CapitaLand said. The company, which is one of the biggest listed on the Singapore Exchange, has a market capitalisation of $17.5 billion.

Source : Business Times - 8 Jan 2008

CapitaLand makes $1.73-a-share offer for rest of Ascott

Filed under: Developer News, Hotel, Property Investment — Propertymarketupdates @ 2:24 am

Move to privatise service residence arm a bid to strengthen unit’s market position

PROPERTY giant CapitaLand plans to privatise The Ascott Group, its listed service residence arm, in a bid to strengthen Ascott’s position in the market and streamline the group’s operations.

The move was announced in a statement to the Singapore Exchange late last night. It followed an earlier statement that fore-shadowed the plan.

Trading of both CapitaLand and Ascott shares were halted the whole of yesterday.

Trading in units of the Ascott Residence Trust (ART) was also halted to avoid confusion, although the trust is not involved in the offer.

CapitaLand will offer $1.73 cash for each share, valuing the entire Ascott group at a whopping $2.8 billion.

The offer price gave investors a healthy 43 per cent premium over the $1.21 closing price on Friday, the last trading day before yesterday’s halt.

The property group already owns 67 per cent of Ascott, which was listed on the mainboard in 2001.

Chief executive of CapitaLand Liew Mun Leong said: ‘CapitaLand has created significant value for its shareholders along the entire real estate value chain and by building a capital-efficient business model.’

For Ascott, ‘this approach can be accelerated further if Ascott is privatised’.

In making the offer, CapitaLand cited intensifying competition in the growing global service residence market.

‘As a listed entity, Ascott has to comply with listing and compliance requirements, and this may restrict Ascott from having full flexibility to leverage on the capital base, resources and opportunities of CapitaLand.’

For example, when CapitaLand partners Ascott in a development now, this counts as an ‘interested person transaction’, which lengthens the time to completion.

Secondly, if Ascott is fully owned by CapitaLand, the property giant feels that it will have more flexibility in managing its mix of developments. It will also be better able to respond to demand in different markets.

Cost savings is a third factor.

Yesterday’s preliminary statement that CapitaLand was looking to buy the Ascott shares it does not own caught the market by surprise.

Some baffled analysts were unable to suggest why the offer had been made.

‘It’s not as though Ascott is in trouble,’ said an investment analyst who asked not to be named. ‘Its gearing is not high - in fact, it’s low - and it’s in a sector that’s doing well.’

Ascott is the largest operator of service apartments in Europe and Asia, with a portfolio of more than 20,000 units in 23 countries. It has a market capitalisation of $1.94 billion.

In 2006, the group spun off some assets into ART, a real estate investment trust that now owns 18 properties .

CapitaLand’s move to take Ascott private ‘goes against the grain of an asset-light balance sheet’, a strategy it has stressed repeatedly, said the investment analyst.

But Kim Eng Research analyst Wilson Liew said CapitaLand might ‘think it’s a good time to buy back some Ascott Group shares’.

‘The consensus seems that it is rather undervalued,’ he said.

Since June, at least five research houses have put out an ‘overweight’ or ‘buy’ call on Ascott, with target prices ranging from $2.17 to $2.46.

It has traded mostly between $1.40 and $1.90 over the last year, hitting a high of $2.06 in May and dropping to a low of $1.12 just weeks ago.

The group’s net asset value per share was 70.6 cents as at Sept 30. Revenue for the three months ended Sept 30 rose 17 per cent to $116.5 million, although net profit dipped 41 per cent to $34.1 million.

Source : Straits Times - 8 Jan 2008

December 31, 2007

Morgan Stanley seeks pot of gold in workers’ dorms

Filed under: Property Deal, Property Investment — Propertymarketupdates @ 11:55 pm

Morgan Stanley has expanded its Singapore real estate investment portfolio to include an unusual asset class - foreign workers’ dormitories.

An entity understood to be linked to the US bank recently bought three dormitories from JTC Corp for $153 million and is said to have teamed up with a local party to purchase more such properties from the private sector, sources say.

‘It may seem an unglamorous property type but the yields can be very attractive and Morgan Stanley has clearly sensed a business opportunity in an area that other foreign funds and property investment groups may not have spotted yet,’ a source says.

Morgan Stanley is said to be targeting dormitories whose tenants include blue-chip companies that lease space in these facilities for their foreign workers.

DTZ Debenham Tie Leung executive director Ong Choon Fah notes that foreign institutional investors have been diversifying their property investments in Asia, including Singapore, over the years.

‘Traditionally, most institutional investors go for income-generating commercial properties like offices and retail, as well as industrial (specifically logistics and warehousing). And then serviced apartments started featuring in their portfolios. In Asia, these investors have started to look at non-traditional assets that offer higher yields as well as (residential) property development, because of yield compression for the traditional asset classes they used to focus on.

‘Yields on these segments have fallen as more and more investments chase limited assets. You now have superannuation funds from Australia, Reits, and sovereign wealth funds, private equity…,’ Mrs Ong says.

She suggests that student housing is another sector that foreign funds may target. ‘Studies have shown this to be quite a stable source of income. In places like the US and Europe, anything with P&L (income flow) can be Reited or be attractive to institutional investors - like senior housing, nursing homes, self-storage facilities, even prisons,’ Mrs Ong notes.

The three dormitories that Morgan Stanley has purchased from JTC are Kian Teck Dormitory in Jurong, Tampines Dormitory and Woodlands Dormitory. Kian Teck Dormitory has 411 units with two types of units - one that can house six to 12 persons per unit, and another for seven to 14 persons per unit. Morgan Stanley unit Avery Strategic Investments bagged the properties following a public tender that closed earlier this year. It was the highest of eight bidders for the dormitories. The sale was completed in the fourth quarter.

There are currently over 20 other major dormitories for housing foreign workers in Singapore. Dormitory rentals have been on the rise, especially in the past 12 months. ‘There’s a shortage of dorms islandwide mainly because of the construction boom. That’s why some property investors are starting to look at these facilities,’ an industry observer says.

Some industry watchers suggest that property yields for dormitory investors could be around 20 per cent or even higher. ‘It depends to a large extent on the length of the balance lease term on the land - the shorter the remaining lease, the higher the return a potential investor will seek. There’s a whole range of land leases for dormitories in the market - freehold, 60 years, 30 years and some even as short as 3 + 3 years,’ an industry observer explains.

Source : Business Times - 27 Dec 2007

New entrants flock in as property sector booms

Filed under: Property Deal, Property Investment — Propertymarketupdates @ 11:53 pm

Six companies, some better known in other businesses, make maiden real estate buys

The property boom over the past two years has drawn many new players who are looking to reap the high returns that property development has to offer.

Six companies made their maiden property purchases this year, data compiled by property firm CB Richard Ellis (CBRE) show. Among them are companies that have made a name for themselves in other businesses, such as construction company KSH Holdings and brokerage firm Kim Eng Holdings. Others are lesser known, like Duchess Development which was formed by two stockbrokers.

In addition, three other companies - BBR Holdings, Popular Holdings and Eastern Holdings - first made their appearance in 2006 with land purchases. This year, they have gone on to snap up more sites.

‘When the market is good, it draws in players who may not have been active before,’ said CBRE executive director Jeremy Lake.

He noted that many of the new entrants are construction companies that might have decided to take on development risks, after watching their developer clients reap big profits. During a property boom, such risks are lessened.

‘If you get your timing right in property, the profits can be substantial,’ Mr Lake said.

Experts said that the same trend was seen during the last property boom, which lasted from 1993 to 1996.

Companies that did not look at property development in the past are now beginning to do so because of the fatter margins.

One example is SuperBowl, which teamed up with its parent company Hiap Hoe to buy two sites for a total of $211.3 million.

SuperBowl’s managing director Teo Ho Beng told BT that while the company will continue to focus on its core leisure and entertainment business, it will also increase its exposure to property development where the margins are better.

Similarly, KSH Holdings sees good opportunities in property development. The company’s chairman and managing director Choo Chee Onn said that his company invested in residential sites this year because the opportunities opened up at the right time.

‘Going forward, we will buy more sites if the right opportunities arise,’ Mr Choo said in an interview. The company spent $180.8 million on two residential sites this year.

The first site, which KSH acquired in June with three other partners, was the construction company’s first purchase of a land parcel.

Other companies branching out from their traditional core businesses for the first time this year include electrical and mechanical engineering firm Tee International.

However, new developers and developers looking at boutique projects still account for only a small chunk of total purchases in 2007.

CBRE’s data shows that the bulk of sites sold this year went to big players such as companies linked to banker Wee Cho Yaw (UOL Group, Kheng Leong, United Industrial Corp and Singapore Land), Malaysian tycoon Quek Leng Chan’s GuocoLand and property giant CapitaLand.

New and boutique developers together bought some $2.4 billion worth of land sites in 2007, which account for about 5 per cent of total investment sales so far this year.

In 2006, such developers accounted for about 4 per cent of all investment sales, while in 2005, the figure was about 3 per cent.

However, property analysts warned that these new entrants are by no means guaranteed success. For starters, most bought sites in the more central areas of Singapore, where the price gain is expected to moderate this year even as construction costs are set to keep climbing, leading to a drop in margins.

‘For the high-end residential segment, there is now risk of a potential correction,’ said OCBC Investment Research analyst Winston Liew.

New developers might not have the resources to keep construction costs down unless they are contractors themselves, experts said.

Next year, established developers who have carved out niches are likely to do best, analysts said.

‘Going into 2008, we look for developers with specific niches and themes to outperform the sector as a whole,’ said CIMB property analyst Donald Chua. The research firm believed that listed smaller-cap developers are likely to trade at a discount to target valuations in 2008.

OCBC’s Mr Liew advocated being defensive when choosing property developer stocks. ‘We prefer developers that are domestic focused with substantial pre-sold projects, opportunities to unlock value from investment properties and finally offering valuation upside,’ he said.

Source : Business Times - 24 Dec 2007

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.